Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
rx366 [2013/12/10 15:55] n1eu |
rx366 [2015/07/15 13:37] n1eu |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| To quantify the differences, compare the Jupiter receiver tests with the Eagle receiver tests. Granted, the original receiver (jupiter hardware) does give a bit better performance due to the DSPs, but generically it is a good yardstick for it. | To quantify the differences, compare the Jupiter receiver tests with the Eagle receiver tests. Granted, the original receiver (jupiter hardware) does give a bit better performance due to the DSPs, but generically it is a good yardstick for it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | http://lists.contesting.com/_tentec/2012-02/msg00096.html | ||
| + | |||
| + | The 9MHz IF Output on the RX366 is the TMP connector on the TXRX board (The board with the filters), right next to the F2 filter. If you are going to use an LP-PAN, you should use the preamp offered by | ||
| + | telepost. We are modifying the user manual to point out it's location in a picture. Should be available for download in a few days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | update: many users have reported a significant birdie in the 9MHz IF Output that brings into question its use for driving an LP-PAN panadapter. Here's the birdie as posted by VE7TK:\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:366birdie.jpg?300 |}}\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | And here's a panadapter display of an empty 10M band, showing spurious signals\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:rx366.gif?300 |}}\\ | ||
| + | Using the RX366 i.f. output to drive a panadapter is not recommended. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
