Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
563upgrade [2011/10/07 11:43]
n1eu
563upgrade [2015/11/24 12:54]
n1eu
Line 29: Line 29:
   *The later 564's have certain changes to top and bottom foil grounding on certain boards to improve 10M birdies which are a major problem with this rig.   *The later 564's have certain changes to top and bottom foil grounding on certain boards to improve 10M birdies which are a major problem with this rig.
   *The BPF filter on later 564's has a broadcast band mod to improve intermod in the presence of strong local AM BCB or SW signals. Night and Day difference on my rig.   *The BPF filter on later 564's has a broadcast band mod to improve intermod in the presence of strong local AM BCB or SW signals. Night and Day difference on my rig.
-  *An aftermarket mod from INRAD is available to improve the SSB audio response involving a swap of two component values. ​ This became a semi-approved factory mod. Stock audio is degraded by passing through the DSP chip when DSP is not engaged+  *An aftermarket mod from INRAD is available to improve the SSB audio response involving a swap of two component values. ​ This became a semi-approved factory mod. Stock audio is degraded by passing through the DSP chip when DSP is not engaged ​///(N1EU note: "high pass filtered"​ is a more accurate description than "​degraded"​ - see [[http://​omni6.wikidot.com/​rxaudio|Omni6 rx audio discussion]])///​
   *Later 564's use significant amounts of SMT construction   *Later 564's use significant amounts of SMT construction
  
Line 49: Line 49:
 **July 2011** //(comment from N1EU)// **July 2011** //(comment from N1EU)//
  
-In light of the improvements described above by N1LQ, I spent several ​hours comparing a 1992 vintage ​Omni 6 with a 2001 vintage Omni 6+ from the very last production batch (serial number 08XXXXX1 purchased in early 2002).  My conclusion ​was that any improvements in rx noise/​birdies was subtle, if at all audible.+N1LQ does a great job of tracing ​the 564 evolutionbut I'd like to offer up some comments: 
 + 
 +1.  I'​ve ​spent many hours of A/B comparisons of various vintages of Omni 6/6+ from 1992 to 2001.  My conclusion ​is that any improvements in rx noise/​birdies was subtle, if at all audible, and that the earliest units performed just about as well as the latest units. 
 + 
 +2.  The Inrad mod audio improvements are slight compared to the real problem, which is the audio dsp.  This is [[http://​omni6.wikidot.com/​rxaudio|discussed elsewhere]]. 
 + 
 +3.  In terms of the use of SMT in later units, the logic board, PBT board, Control board and IF/AF board all became SMT.  The 9Mhz Xtal Filter board was SMT from the start of production.  
 + 
 +4.  Changes were made in components in the product detector circuit on the IF/AF board of the Omni 6+ to improve intermod distortion over the Omni 6. 

QR Code
QR Code 563upgrade (generated for current page)