Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
588bug [2008/02/24 04:18] n5na created |
588bug [2018/10/31 17:28] n5na |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| I read an earlier post on the topic. I connected my 1949 Vibroplex to the Omni VII and observed the double dit syndrome did indeed exist. | I read an earlier post on the topic. I connected my 1949 Vibroplex to the Omni VII and observed the double dit syndrome did indeed exist. | ||
| - | Once I cleaned the contacts on the bug and adjusted the bug per the following http://www.vibroplex.com/original_bug_adjustments.pdf everything calmed down and the waveform on the monitor scope looked quite nice. | + | Once I cleaned the contacts on the bug and adjusted the bug per this {{original_bug_adjustments.pdf|article}} everything calmed down and the waveform on the monitor scope looked quite nice. |
| - | I then listened to my signal on http://www.smeter.net/slc/slc.php with its delay thus proved my success. | + | I then listened to my signal on smeter.net with its delay thus proved my success. |
| My contact cleaning technique is to use a 1/2" wide strip cut from a 3" x 5" index card. Close the contact manually and drag the strip through the contact area 10 to 15 times. | My contact cleaning technique is to use a 1/2" wide strip cut from a 3" x 5" index card. Close the contact manually and drag the strip through the contact area 10 to 15 times. | ||
